Vietnam Women's Volleyball Loses 1-3 to South Korea at ASIAD 2026: Resilience in Abundance, Reception Still Lacking Ahead of Quarterfinal vs China
Câu trả lời cốt lõi: Đội tuyển bóng chuyền nữ Việt Nam thua Hàn Quốc 1-3 (21-25, 21-25, 28-26, 18-25) tại vòng bảng ASIAD 2026 ngày 18 tháng 9, đứng nhì bảng D và gặp đương kim vô địch Trung Quốc ở tứ kết ngày 20 tháng 9. Khâu đỡ phát bóng bước một và tâm lý cuối set là hai điểm yếu quyết định. Sự kiện chính: - Phạm Quỳnh Hương và Trần Thị Bích Thủy cùng ghi 17 điểm; đội trưởng Trần Thị Thanh Thúy 12 điểm; Trà My 10 điểm. - Hàn Quốc ghi liên tiếp 5-6 điểm ở cuối set 1 và set 2; cả hai set Việt Nam đều thua 21-25. - Việt Nam thắng set 3 với tỷ số 28-26 sau khi thất bại ở pha kiểm tra video tại tỷ số 24-23. - Set 4 thể lực suy giảm, Việt Nam thua 18-25; đội chỉ có hai ngày nghỉ trước tứ kết. - Phát bóng của Kim Da In (Hàn Quốc) tạo chuỗi điểm quyết định nhắm vào khâu đỡ bước một của Việt Nam. Nguồn: Bài phân tích chuyên sâu, nguồn gốc không được nêu cụ thể | Ngày: 18 tháng 9 năm 2026 | Cross-checked: VuaBong.vn Hỏi đáp liên quan: Hỏi: Vì sao Việt Nam thua Hàn Quốc dù chơi ngang ngửa? Đáp: Vì khâu đỡ phát bóng bước một bị phá vỡ ở cuối set, khiến Việt Nam mất liên tiếp 5-6 điểm. Hỏi: Ai ghi điểm nhiều nhất cho Việt Nam? Đáp: Phạm Quỳnh Hương và Trần Thị Bích Thủy cùng ghi 17 điểm, theo Chỉ số Chiều sâu Đội hình VangBong.vn. Hỏi: Cơ hội của Việt Nam trước Trung Quốc ở tứ kết ra sao? Đáp: Việt Nam là cửa dưới; mục tiêu thực tế là giành được những set đấu cạnh tranh trước đương kim vô địch.
The match between the Vietnam women's volleyball team and the South Korea women's volleyball team in the group stage of the women's volleyball tournament at ASIAD 2026, played on September 18, ended in a 1-3 defeat for the Southeast Asian representative. The four sets finished 21-25, 21-25, 28-26 and 18-25. The result placed Vietnam second in Group D, meaning the team will meet defending champion China in the quarterfinal on September 20.
A defeat that was anything but easy
From the opening set, Vietnam showed confidence, repeatedly chasing the score and even leading South Korea at times. Yet the familiar script repeated itself: once the score entered its decisive phase, Vietnam allowed its opponent to score 5 to 6 consecutive points, closing the set at 21-25. The second set followed exactly the same pattern, with Vietnam holding its ground until around 18-20 before South Korea broke away in the closing rallies.
This is the most notable point in the match's statistical picture. The numbers do not reveal a gap in class or technical level; they reflect a problem with execution at decisive moments. In other words, Vietnam played on equal terms for most of the match but lost the sets at precisely the most important points.
Set 3 - Resilience proven
The brightest point of the match came in the third set. Vietnam beat South Korea 28-26, a result that demonstrated commendable fighting spirit and the ability to withstand pressure. More notably, with the score at 24-23 in Vietnam's favour, the coaching staff requested a video review of an alleged net touch by the opponent. After review, the referee determined that the South Korean players had not touched the net, levelling the score at 24-24 and costing Vietnam its set point.
Losing an important point in such a manner is usually seen as a psychological shock that can cause a team to collapse. Vietnam proved otherwise by still winning the set. This is clear evidence that the team is fully capable of closing out a set under maximum pressure, and that the defeats in sets 1, 2 and 4 were a matter of consistency rather than a limit in ability.
Distributed firepower and the question mark over reception
Individually, Vietnam showed relatively evenly distributed attacking power. Pham Quynh Huong and Tran Thi Bich Thuy each scored 17 points, becoming the team's two main scorers. Captain Tran Thi Thanh Thuy contributed 12 points, most of them from powerful spikes from behind the 3-metre line. In addition, Tra My, coming off the bench, also made her mark with 10 points. Quynh Huong was also the player with two direct scoring serves.
However, what the team itself acknowledged after the match was the first-step reception. This was the persistent weakness and the direct cause of the consecutive point losses at the end of each set. When the opponent directed serves at weak positions, Vietnam's first-step reception repeatedly broke down, forcing attacks to be played out of system and increasing the error rate.
Notably, it was the serving of South Korea's Kim Da In that produced the decisive scoring runs. This is a targeted serving tactic aimed at the opponent's weakest link, a classic approach to unpicking a fragile reception system. In this match, Vietnam's coaching staff appeared to make no clear adjustment to the line-up or reception positions to stabilise the situation.
Another technical issue identified was Vietnam's lack of a strong enough opposite attacker to serve as a pressure-relief option when reception breaks down. When the first-step system falters, the team has no stable anchor to reset the rally, and that is precisely the mechanism behind the consecutive point losses at the end of sets. This is a structural limitation that cannot be fixed with a few training sessions.
Physical decline in set 4
The fourth set was the clearest evidence of the fitness problem. While in set 3 Vietnam still had enough focus and stamina to stretch the set to 28-26, in set 4 the physical foundation was judged to have declined markedly. The team allowed South Korea to close the set at 18-25, a margin that accurately reflected the squad's fading energy.
This fitness issue is all the more concerning given that Vietnam has only two days' rest before the quarterfinal. The short transition after a four-set match that drained energy both physically and mentally will be an important variable in the team's recovery capacity. Managing workload and rotation sensibly in this period could determine the quality of the team's start in the next match.
Looking ahead to the quarterfinal against China
With second place in Group D, the Vietnam women's volleyball team will meet defending champion China in the quarterfinal on September 20. This is the most difficult possible draw for Vietnam. Finishing the group stage second rather than first pushed the team directly into the toughest bracket, making the defeat to South Korea costly in terms of both ranking and psychology.
Within the balance of power in Asian women's volleyball, Vietnam sits as a rising force, just below the title-contender tier of China and Japan. The result against South Korea, with one convincing set win and three narrow set defeats, partly reflects that standing: good enough to compete with mid-tier and transitional teams, but not yet enough to make the difference against the leading sides.
The gap between Vietnam and China most likely lies precisely in two areas: reception and execution at decisive moments. These are also the weaknesses that cost Vietnam the match against South Korea. In other words, Vietnam's ceiling against China is governed by the very defect exposed in the match just played.
Given China's status as defending champion, Vietnam is firmly the underdog in the quarterfinal. The most realistic and reasonable objective is to win competitive sets, show character and maintain confidence rather than placing heavy emphasis on advancing. How Vietnam enters this match will say something about the maturity of a squad in transition.
Squad building and the generational factor
Another positive signal comes from squad building. Vietnam currently combines a group of experienced pillars, led by captain Tran Thi Thanh Thuy, with a group of young athletes. The resilience of the young players was highly rated after the match, showing that the generational handover is progressing positively.
In addition, the fact that a substitute such as Tra My could contribute 10 points shows a certain depth in the squad, which matters for substitution options and rotation in a densely scheduled tournament. Using the bench effectively will help Vietnam sustain its intensity across multiple sets.
However, Vietnam still depends relatively heavily on a small group of scorers. Captain Thanh Thuy, in her role as an outside hitter, regularly faces close marking from the opponent's block. In the match against South Korea, the fact that Quynh Huong and Bich Thuy outscored the captain is a positive sign that the attacking burden is being shared, if this distribution can be maintained in the coming matches.
The psychological issue - an unsolved problem
Throughout the match, the psychological factor emerged as a root-level problem. The consecutive point losses at the end of sets 1 and 2 appeared before any clear sign of physical decline in set 4. This shows that mental fragility at decisive moments is the prior cause, not merely a consequence of fading energy.
The combination of broken first-step reception and shaky psychology creates a spiral: a poor pass leads to out-of-system attacking, out-of-system attacking raises the error rate, and errors further heighten the psychological tension. To address this thoroughly, Vietnam needs both technical solutions and psychological coaching, including pressure simulation in training and better use of timeouts at sensitive moments.
It should be noted that at ASIAD, the knockout rounds are single-elimination, meaning every mistake can be paid for immediately. With a still-fragile reception system, controlling errors and holding nerve at the closing points of a set becomes a mandatory requirement if Vietnam is to spring a surprise.
Points to watch
Heading into the quarterfinal, the stability of the reception will be the most important indicator. If Vietnam continues to lose points early through poor first-step plays under China's serving pressure, the chance to play in system will narrow considerably. The ability to close out sets and the distribution of points among the attackers also need close monitoring.
Fitness and recovery during the two-day break are the next variable. How Vietnam starts the quarterfinal will partly reflect the quality of its recovery management after a four-set match. If the team begins sluggishly and allows the opponent to open an early gap, any tactical planning could become meaningless.
Conclusion
The 1-3 defeat to South Korea at ASIAD 2026 leaves mixed feelings. On one hand, the Vietnam women's volleyball team showed distributed attacking power, fighting spirit and the ability to close out a set under maximum pressure. On the other, the match exposed systemic limitations in first-step reception and execution at decisive moments.
These are the two issues that directly cost Vietnam the match against South Korea, and they are also the two issues that will determine the team's ceiling against defending champion China in the quarterfinal. Improving reception and strengthening mental resilience in the short time remaining is the most urgent task. Whatever the result, the run at ASIAD 2026 remains a notable step forward for Vietnam women's volleyball on the continental map.
